This Day in History

Daily Cartoon provided by Bravenet

  #1  
Old 02-25-2007
UZI4U's Avatar
UZI4U UZI4U is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: San Antonio, Texas.
Posts: 890
Default The Official List Of "Likely To Be Banned" Firearms

Now that the anti-gun crowd is back in power in the United States and starting to put on their warpaint, we need to get together a list of the firearms they will likely try to ban, so as to help all of us decide what our next purchase goals should be (obviously this is only really important to US Residents, but I'll take help from everyone).

Here's the way this works: There will be categories of "likely to be banned" firearms, and lists of the firearms therein.

A category is something like "Assault weapons", "Fifty-caliber anti-satellite space cannons" and "5.7mm Cop Killer Baby-Seeking Smart-Handguns"

Also, this is not limited to firearms, but also accessories, like magazines.


If you would like to suggest a category, post it as a reply. I'll consider it, and if it stands to reason, add it to the master list.

If you would like to suggest a firearm type that belongs in a certain category, post it in a reply. Post it's name, what category it belongs in, and a link to the manufacturers website. If there isn't a website, post a picture of it and the MSRP.

Don't provide multiple links to the same thing... For example, the AR-15 is likely to be banned. Bushmaster makes many types of AR-15. Thus there will be a link to Bushmaster under "AR-15", but there will not be a link to each type of AR-15 they make... There are too many.

However, a link to each manufacturer is a good thing.


Here are the rules for each entry:

#1: Must fit one of the "likely to be banned" categories.

#2: Must be avaliable on the US civil market, must not be an NFA item at present time.


Feel free to add things as time allows.
__________________
Am Yisrael Chai!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-25-2007
UZI4U's Avatar
UZI4U UZI4U is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: San Antonio, Texas.
Posts: 890
Default

"Assault Rifles" with two evil features:

AR-15s:

Armalite M-15 & AR-10 rifles: http://www.armalite.com/sales/catalog/rifles.htm

Bushmaster XM-15 & Carbon-15 Model-4 rifles: http://www.bushmaster.com/shopping/

Rock River Arms LAR-15 & LAR-10 rifles: http://www.rockriverarms.com/






"Assault Rifles" with one evil feature:


None added yet.






"High-Capacity" Magazines


None added yet.








Fifty-Caliber Rifles:


Barrett M82, M95, M99 & M107 rifles: http://www.barrettrifles.com/










"Cop Killer" Handguns:

None added yet, will include the Five-SeveN and S&W 500.
__________________
Am Yisrael Chai!

Last edited by UZI4U : 02-25-2007 at 12:14 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-25-2007
PT-The Italian Commie's Avatar
PT-The Italian Commie PT-The Italian Commie is offline
Super Senior member - Has no life and spends a lot of time here
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Sardinia, Italy
Posts: 2,611
Red face

[first post]

Hey, if you have read the new "AWB 2007" proposal (see it in my "OMFG!" post in the Political discussion), they want to ban as "Assault weapons" the RUGER MINI-14 and the M1 CARBINE.

What to say... another occasion lost to STFU and think.



[second post]

Let's face it...

How many possibilities does it has to pass?

IMHO, close to zero. If you think:

#1 - That, AFAIK, ther AWB 2007 contradicts in many points the "Gun Owners Protection Act" of 1986, which is permanent, and because of these contradictions this new AWB could not enter in effectiveness or should be heavily modified;

#2 - That not even all Democrats are anti-guns (remember, when the "Brady Bill" AWB was passed back in 1994, it was made to expire within 10 years, 'cause if they had proposed it to be permanent, most Democrats themselves would not have voted it anyway);

Well, if you have "your people" (you know what I mean with that) do their part for the good, you have some decent possibilities to pass through this proposals, virtually, undamaged.

But, again, you can never know...


[apologies for editing your two posts into one... Just trying to clean things up so the list is near the top of the thread. The content is unharmed, just moved]
__________________
"It is criminal to teach a man not to defend himself, when he is the constant victim of brutal attacks. It is legal and lawful to own a shotgun or a rifle. We believe in obeying the law." -- Malcolm X

"We (atheists) act in good conscience because we believe in moral principles, not because we expect a reward in Heaven." -- Margherita Hack


Last edited by UZI4U : 02-25-2007 at 12:20 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-25-2007
UZI4U's Avatar
UZI4U UZI4U is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: San Antonio, Texas.
Posts: 890
Default

The situation isn't as optimistic as you would think.


The democrats are as anti-gun as ever, and as stupid as ever. Odds are high they'll try to pass something anti-gun.

The republicans are as retarded as ever, and unlikely to seriously fight it. Besides, it works in their favor to anger the gun-owner crowd against the democrats.
__________________
Am Yisrael Chai!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-25-2007
TJ's Avatar
TJ TJ is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Tucson Arizona
Posts: 564
Default

High capacity magazine? How about the term "standard capacity magazine"? If the pistol normally has a 16 round magazine then that would be a standard capacity. Same with a rifle with a 30 rd magazine or whatever.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-25-2007
Mk23 Mk23 is offline
Super Senior member - Has no life and spends a lot of time here
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 320
Default Although...

Not all optimistic, but not all gloom and doom either.

One of the key reasons the Democrats won congress (with a victory that small, more and more reasons can be considered key) is that a lot of Democrat senators got better NRA scores than their Republican opponents.

More Democrats are pro-gun than they used to be... and I still can't fricking wrap my mind around that.

Next thing we know the Republicans are going to turn anti-gun just to give me a god damn aneurism.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-25-2007
UZI4U's Avatar
UZI4U UZI4U is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: San Antonio, Texas.
Posts: 890
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TJ
High capacity magazine? How about the term "standard capacity magazine"? If the pistol normally has a 16 round magazine then that would be a standard capacity. Same with a rifle with a 30 rd magazine or whatever.

Did you notice the "sneer quotes"?

As in how Jihad is about a "peaceful" "inner" struggle.
__________________
Am Yisrael Chai!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-26-2007
PT-The Italian Commie's Avatar
PT-The Italian Commie PT-The Italian Commie is offline
Super Senior member - Has no life and spends a lot of time here
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Sardinia, Italy
Posts: 2,611
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TJ
High capacity magazine? How about the term "standard capacity magazine"? If the pistol normally has a 16 round magazine then that would be a standard capacity. Same with a rifle with a 30 rd magazine or whatever.

"Hi-Cap mag": anything over 10 rounds.
__________________
"It is criminal to teach a man not to defend himself, when he is the constant victim of brutal attacks. It is legal and lawful to own a shotgun or a rifle. We believe in obeying the law." -- Malcolm X

"We (atheists) act in good conscience because we believe in moral principles, not because we expect a reward in Heaven." -- Margherita Hack

Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-03-2007
D Yankee (The Zionist)'s Avatar
D Yankee (The Zionist) D Yankee (The Zionist) is offline
Super Senior member - Has no life and spends a lot of time here
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 719
Send a message via AIM to D Yankee (The Zionist) Send a message via MSN to D Yankee (The Zionist) Send a message via Yahoo to D Yankee (The Zionist)
Default Re: The Official List Of "Likely To Be Banned" Firearms

Quote:
Originally Posted by TJ
High capacity magazine? How about the term "standard capacity magazine"? If the pistol normally has a 16 round magazine then that would be a standard capacity. Same with a rifle with a 30 rd magazine or whatever.


Yes, there is no high capacity anymore.
__________________
You who inherit the heavy privilege to serve in freedom's name, must brace for the battle surely to come.

-- Charlton Heston, 1923-2008
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-25-2007
UZI4U's Avatar
UZI4U UZI4U is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: San Antonio, Texas.
Posts: 890
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PT-The Italian Commie
Hey, if you have read the new "AWB 2007" proposal (see it in my "OMFG!" post in the Political discussion), they want to ban as "Assault weapons" the RUGER MINI-14 and the M1 CARBINE.

What to say... another occasion lost to STFU and think.

So I've seen. Hence why I'm going to include a "A-salt Rifles With One EviL Feature" section.
__________________
Am Yisrael Chai!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright SecurityArms.com 1995 - 2009