|
|||||||
| General discussion about most anything not listed below. General off the wall comments, rants or whatever. Keep it family friendly please |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yeah the .30 Pederson round was far, far weaker than the .30 Carbine, and probably would have been of questionable effectiveness in the desired role.
__________________
propa·gandist n. A person convinced that the ends justify the memes. |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
The .30 M1 was specifically designed for the M1 Carbine. To be a lightweight alternative to the Garand during early WW2. Filling the gap between pistol and Rifle, (with moderate success if you ask me).
BTW, have any of you ever seen a bushmaster? Does anyone have a pic? |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]() |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Springfield Armory M1903 "Bushmaster"
These improvised carbines were regular issue M1903's that were modified by GI's and some were belived to be coded with BUSH for Bushmaster. The bushmaster had both the barrel cutdown to 18'' for convenience and mobility just as the enfield changed into the "Jungle-carbine". The stock was even shorter the the former experimental Cavalry Carbine of 1920, completely missing the front part of the stock. It is belived that 4,725 such rifles were configured into bushmasters by troops stationed in Panama around 1940. It was used there as a training rifle but never saw action in the war. After the war they were destroyed by dumping them into the ocean a few miles outside Panama. Picture #1 shows a regular issue early M1903 just like the ones to be re-configured into a Bushmaster Picture #2 shows the experimental Cavalry Carbine of 1920 For further info see US Martial Arms Collector and Springfield Research Newsletter issue # 91 Last edited by Cesare : 01-19-2007 at 03:53 PM. |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thank you for your explanation.
![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|