This Day in History

Daily Cartoon provided by Bravenet

  #1  
Old 01-03-2007
Dolphin_Shooter's Avatar
Dolphin_Shooter Dolphin_Shooter is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 617
Default Some refreashing truth for tyler

This piece is a real fire-breather. Shouldn't be hard to find a lot of misstatements in it. Should it?

--------------------------------

http://www.anncoulter.com/cgi-local/welcome.cgi

THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY: A VAST SLEEPER CELL

by Ann Coulter
January 3, 2007

Fortunately for liberals, the Iraqis executed Saddam Hussein the exact same week that former President Ford died, so it didn't seem strange that Nancy Pelosi's flag was at half-staff. Also, Saddam's death made it less of a snub when Harry Reid skipped Ford's funeral.

The passing of Gerald Ford should remind Americans that Democrats are always lying in wait, ready to force a humiliating defeat on America.

More troops, fewer troops, different troops, "redeployment" — all the Democrats' peculiar little talking points are just a way of sounding busy. Who are they kidding? Democrats want to cut and run as fast as possible from Iraq, betraying the Iraqis who supported us and rewarding our enemies — exactly as they did to the South Vietnamese under Ford.

Liberals spent the Vietnam War rooting for the enemy and clamoring for America's defeat, a tradition they have brought back for the Iraq war.

They insisted on calling the Soviet-backed Vietcong "the National Liberation Front of Vietnam," just as they call Islamic fascists killing Americans in Iraq "insurgents." Ho Chi Minh was hailed as a "Jeffersonian Democrat," just as Michael Moore compares the Islamic fascists in Iraq to the Minute Men.

During the Vietnam War, New York Times scion Arthur "Pinch" Sulzberger told his father that if an American soldier ran into a North Vietnamese soldier, he would prefer for the American to get shot. "It's the other guy's country," he explained.

Now, as publisher of the Times, Pinch does all he can to help the enemy currently shooting at American soldiers.

After a half-dozen years of Democrat presidents creating a looming disaster in Vietnam — with Kennedy ordering the assassination of our own ally in the middle of the war and Johnson ham-handedly choosing bombing targets from the Oval Office — in 1969, Nixon became president and the world was safe again.

Nixon began a phased withdrawal of American ground troops, while protecting the South Vietnamese by increasing the bombings of the North, mining North Vietnamese harbors and attacking North Vietnamese military supplies in Cambodia — all actions hysterically denounced by American liberals, eager for the communists to defeat America.

Despite the massive anti-war protests staged by the Worst Generation, their takeovers of university buildings and their bombings of federal property to protest the bombing of North Vietnamese property, Nixon's Vietnam policy was apparently popular with normal Americans. In 1972, he won re-election against "peace" candidate George McGovern in a 49-state landslide.

In January 1973, the United States signed the Paris Peace accords, which would have ended the war with honor. In order to achieve a ceasefire, Nixon jammed lousy terms down South Vietnam's throat, such as allowing Vietcong troops to remain in the South. But in return, we promised South Vietnam that we would resume bombing missions and provide military aid if the North attacked.

It would have worked, but the Democrats were desperate for America to lose. They invented "Watergate," the corpus delicti of which wouldn't have merited three column-inches during the Clinton years, and hounded Nixon out of office. (How's Sandy Berger weathering that tough wrist-slap?)

Three months after Nixon was gone, we got the Watergate Congress and with it, the new Democratic Party. In lieu of the old Democratic Party, which lost wars out of incompetence and naivete, the new Democratic Party would lose wars on purpose.

Just one month after the Watergate Congress was elected, North Vietnam attacked the South.

Even milquetoast, pro-abortion, detente-loving Gerald R. Ford knew America had to defend South Vietnam or America's word would be worth nothing. As Ford said, "American unwillingness to provide adequate assistance to allies fighting for their lives could seriously affect our credibility throughout the world as an ally." He pleaded repeatedly with the Democratic Congress simply to authorize aid to South Vietnam — no troops, just money.

But the Democrats turned their backs on South Vietnam, betrayed an ally and trashed America's word. Within a month of Ford's last appeal to Congress to help South Vietnam, Saigon fell.

The entire world watched as American personnel desperately scrambled into helicopters from embassy rooftops in Saigon while beating back our own allies, to whom we could offer no means of escape. It was the most demeaning image of America ever witnessed, until Britney Spears came along.

Southeast Asia was promptly consumed in a maelstrom of violence that seems to occur whenever these "Jeffersonian Democrats" come to power. Communist totalitarians swept through Laos, Cambodia and all of Vietnam. They staged gruesome massacres so vast that none other than Sen. George McGovern called for military intervention to stop a "clear case of genocide" in Cambodia.

Five years after that, Islamic lunatics in Iran felt no compunction about storming the embassy of what was once the greatest superpower on Earth and taking American citizens hostage for 14 months. To this day, al-Qaida boosts the flagging morale of its jihadists by reminding them of America's humiliating retreat from Vietnam.

In addition to being wrong about Ford's pardon of Nixon, liberals were wrong about a few other things from that era. Democrats haven't admitted error in rejecting Ford's pleas on behalf of South Vietnam because there are still dangerous foreigners trying to kill Americans. Nixon is safely interred in the ground, but the enemies of America continue to need the Democrats' help.
__________________
"Political Correctness is a doctrine fostered by a delusional illogical liberal minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous liberal press which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end."
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-04-2007
PT-The Italian Commie's Avatar
PT-The Italian Commie PT-The Italian Commie is offline
Super Senior member - Has no life and spends a lot of time here
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Sardinia, Italy
Posts: 2,611
Default

Oh, yeah. So the -DEMOCRATS- "invented" the Watergate scandal.

Go have a refresh of History 101, pal. For your own sake.
__________________
"It is criminal to teach a man not to defend himself, when he is the constant victim of brutal attacks. It is legal and lawful to own a shotgun or a rifle. We believe in obeying the law." -- Malcolm X

"We (atheists) act in good conscience because we believe in moral principles, not because we expect a reward in Heaven." -- Margherita Hack

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-04-2007
Dolphin_Shooter's Avatar
Dolphin_Shooter Dolphin_Shooter is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 617
Default Watergate wasen't Shit

Compared to all the shit clinton got away with..It was a traffic ticket in comparison..why his ass has never been brought to justice is what I'd like to know.http://www.apfn.org/apfn/count.htm
__________________
"Political Correctness is a doctrine fostered by a delusional illogical liberal minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous liberal press which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end."
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-16-2007
D Yankee (The Zionist)'s Avatar
D Yankee (The Zionist) D Yankee (The Zionist) is offline
Super Senior member - Has no life and spends a lot of time here
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 719
Send a message via AIM to D Yankee (The Zionist) Send a message via MSN to D Yankee (The Zionist) Send a message via Yahoo to D Yankee (The Zionist)
Default I've got a solution for your obvious consuming self hatred

Take one of your firearms and point the barrel (you know, the end with the little hole in it, sort of like your daddy's pee pee) and aim it at your face. You'll figure the rest out. (I hope).
__________________
You who inherit the heavy privilege to serve in freedom's name, must brace for the battle surely to come.

-- Charlton Heston, 1923-2008
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-16-2007
PT-The Italian Commie's Avatar
PT-The Italian Commie PT-The Italian Commie is offline
Super Senior member - Has no life and spends a lot of time here
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Sardinia, Italy
Posts: 2,611
Default My usual 2 (Euro)Cents...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyler Durden
Cause all Clinton did was lie about ruining a dress.

#1: Okay, Clinton had a blowjob given by his stagist from under the desk. And so what? Here in Italy, the average age of our politicians is 'round 60-y-o, shall we know that one of them indulges in such practices, hey, it'd be a miracle that he can still have an hard-on!

#2: What is worse, to lie about a matter of personal sex between consenting adults, or to lie about the reason why a (dick)Head of State sends thousands of troops to die in a sandbag?

#3: Maybe the constant blowjobs given to Clinton caused his overall pressure to cool down. Hence why he was less screwed.
__________________
"It is criminal to teach a man not to defend himself, when he is the constant victim of brutal attacks. It is legal and lawful to own a shotgun or a rifle. We believe in obeying the law." -- Malcolm X

"We (atheists) act in good conscience because we believe in moral principles, not because we expect a reward in Heaven." -- Margherita Hack


Last edited by PT-The Italian Commie : 01-16-2007 at 08:55 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-16-2007
Cesare's Avatar
Cesare Cesare is offline
Super Senior member - Has no life and spends a lot of time here
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 617
Default

I dont think Clinton would have acted much diffrently, although being a democrat. He wouldnt back down from sending some cruise missiles or bomb the shit out of people. I think after 9-11 we would have seen war even if the adulterer would have been in power. Perhaps just not in the wrong country for the wrong reason at the wrong time.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-16-2007
UZI4U's Avatar
UZI4U UZI4U is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: San Antonio, Texas.
Posts: 890
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PT-The Italian Commie
#2: What is worse, to lie about a matter of personal sex between consenting adults, or to lie about the reason why a (dick)Head of State sends thousands of troops to die in a sandbag?

I've already shown a dozen times that Iraq had various WMDs as well as a nuclear research program they were forbidden from having by the cease-fire agreement. So it's time to find a new argument besides "BOOOOSH LIIIIIIIIIIID PEEEPOLS DIIIIIIIIIID!"
__________________
Am Yisrael Chai!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-16-2007
Dolphin_Shooter's Avatar
Dolphin_Shooter Dolphin_Shooter is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 617
Default Pointless deaths?

I'm so glad you liberal cocksuckers weren't around back in WW2.I could only imagine what your response would have been to the D-day invastion.
If only we had used some common sense and dropped Napalm on woodstock
3/4's of you marxist fuckheads would'nt be alive today.
__________________
"Political Correctness is a doctrine fostered by a delusional illogical liberal minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous liberal press which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end."
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-16-2007
UZI4U's Avatar
UZI4U UZI4U is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: San Antonio, Texas.
Posts: 890
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dolphin_Shooter
I'm so glad you liberal cocksuckers weren't around back in WW2.I could only imagine what your response would have been to the D-day invastion.
If only we had used some common sense and dropped Napalm on woodstock
3/4's of you marxist fuckheads would'nt be alive today.

That assumes they're actually alive today.
__________________
Am Yisrael Chai!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-17-2007
PT-The Italian Commie's Avatar
PT-The Italian Commie PT-The Italian Commie is offline
Super Senior member - Has no life and spends a lot of time here
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Sardinia, Italy
Posts: 2,611
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by UZI4U
I've already shown a dozen times that Iraq had various WMDs as well as a nuclear research program they were forbidden from having by the cease-fire agreement. So it's time to find a new argument besides "BOOOOSH LIIIIIIIIIIID PEEEPOLS DIIIIIIIIIID!"

Humm, well, let's see... NO.

It has been shown a dozen times that Iraq had various WMDs as well as a nuclear research program BEFORE THE INVASION OF KUWAIT, when his programs were cheered at by the entire West. All "evidences" given by the US intelligence of those programs having been running after "Operation Desert Storm" have 100% been pointed as false by both international authorities AND the so-called "Iraqi members of the programs". The fact that those very same Iraqi scientists have talked about running WMD programs in the late 1990s AFTER having been apprehended by "Coalition" troops and tortured half to death in Abu Grahib or Guantanamo only proves that your Administration is ready to do EVERYTHING to reach its dirty ends... which are NOT, let me repeat, any "defeat of terrorism". If G.W. Bush & Co. would have REALLY wanted to defeat terrorism, it would have been over since a long, and the tactics used would have been totally different from the ones employed now. The fact is that Bush & Friends -DO NEED- a strong, clear and present, everlasting terrorist menace to justify their deeds in the eyes of the worldwide public opinion.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dolphin_Shooter
I'm so glad you liberal cocksuckers weren't around back in WW2.I could only imagine what your response would have been to the D-day invastion.

62 years ago we all were fighting against the menace of Nazism. Which was NOT a false or exaggerated menace like the current "Terrorist threat" waved by the Bush administration.
As I said at least 100 times, you can not compare the World War 2 with the current situation. 62 years ago, your Country was with the GOOD guys. At the present time, it's only a rumble between two rival criminal gangs for the control of the hood.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dolphin_Shooter
If only we had used some common sense and dropped Napalm on woodstock
3/4's of you marxist fuckheads would'nt be alive today.

You know what? It's the same kind of stuff that UZI said when he stated that the "Liberal" ideologies are going to die because there are scientific evidences proving that the Left-wingers make less children.

It's clear as sun that you guys know jack and shit about the propagation of ideals.

BTW, you call me liberal, you are assholes. You think that Liberals are left-wing? Down here, Liberals are just one step ahead of Fascism. Again, you know jack and shit about what's the real meaning of being "Left Wing".
__________________
"It is criminal to teach a man not to defend himself, when he is the constant victim of brutal attacks. It is legal and lawful to own a shotgun or a rifle. We believe in obeying the law." -- Malcolm X

"We (atheists) act in good conscience because we believe in moral principles, not because we expect a reward in Heaven." -- Margherita Hack

Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright SecurityArms.com 1995 - 2009