|
|||||||
| General Firearms discussion Talk about anything firearms related |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
... Or something like that.
http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/metro/i...100.xml&coll=1 Quote:
So let me see... the SKS is highly accurate [compared to what? A flintlock musket?], fires high-caliber ammunition, can go right through engine blocks, but somehow has an onboard guidance system that can detect bone, change the bullets course mid-flight and travel down the entire length of the human body, making a 45 degree turn in the foot to exit the toe... I guess these must be those new blended-metal-nuclear-powered-guided-NASA-space-shuttle-doorgunner-rounds. Wiskey Tango Foxtrot over? ![]() |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Those must have been the magical rounds that provided the model for the "Single Bullet" theory.
__________________
"Conservative, n, A statesman who is enamored of existing evils, as distinguished from the Liberal, who wishes to replace them with others."- Ambrose Bierce's "Devil's Dictionary (1911)" ![]() If you can't beat them, join them. Then beat them. Barring that, arrange to have them beaten. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
OK--
That's a fucking joke-- pardon my french-- my girlfriend's father (a corrections director and Lake Charles sherrif's patrol officer for 15 years) mailed me the same article-- when I visit next week, he and I are gonna make a little trip with about a half dozen Armory personel from around the L.C., Alexandria, and Sulphur PD's to NOLA office to formerly deliver a complaint. Christ-- you'd think nobody's heard the name Fackler before--here's a bit of what I've got written so far to send in to the newspaper: (misspellings and grammatical errors to be revised) Dear sirs-- In consideration to your recent article concerning the arrest of one Anthony Thomas, your news group highly over estimated the damage of the SKS rifle. While the media has been exaggerating the lethality/damage complex of weapons for years, this recent "elephant in the closet" is simply laughable. In addition, the report that the weapon can, "that can blast through engine blocks as easily as it can bones," yet, "follow bone, so a bullet can 'enter your shoulder and come out of your toe'" is in itself contradictory (sic. Lee, "5 men arrested as police raid Algiers complex" 7/12/06). And while I've already written both Lee and his "source" (one officer Faust), I, as well as other members of the knowledgeable arms community, feel it imperative to have such misnomers cast aside. In as much, we'd like to turn your attention to the following document: http://www.rkba.org/research/fackler/wrong.pdf The preceeding is not the best scan of the article, but it provides still the best "guesstimate' in projecting possible wound damage. The truth to the matter is that there is no possible means to accurately depict a porojected idea of possible wound damage since upon striking soft flesh, the ballistics of the round (affected by range, caliber, velocity, angle of impact, etc.) will determine the outcome. I grew up not around firearms, but the surgical community. It has only been within the last 16 years that I've spent intensive time pursuing my mainstay hobby: firearms. However, to the point at hand; within those 16 years I have also maintained a close relationship with those within the medical field and assisted them in writing formal and professional documents/articles on reported firearms related injuries. Added to Fackler's article and the experiences I've related over the described time span, added to further articles published in magazines such as JAMA, SMR, and similar medical journals; no bullet can effectively enter a human body and make any exponential journey exceeding its terminal velocity. The most devestating effect of any firearm based projectile is, and always will be, hydrostatic shock. similarly, due to the fiberous "give" to (and pardon the term for the lack of a better) flesh and the accrued angle of bone, upon impact a bullter will immediately begin to compress, the surrounding tissue absorbing the shock and then transferring energy away from the entry wound. Lee's quoted impression of damage, as previously stated, is highly over exaggerated by known impressions of not only the SKS's caliber, but bullets as a whole. Regardless of core material, bullet jacket, and composition of both, it still must meet against the streinuous density and structure of bone. In lossing two thirds of velocity and terminal structure, a bullet will always travel in the path of least resistence. In as much, it is least likely to simply follow the length of the bone. I then turn your atention to a article published in the Medical News Review by Dr. Rick Harrison (25.2, 10/15/04) entitled, "Tertiary skin damage to high caliber wounds." In this article, Dr. Harrison documents a number of hunting related gunshot wounds where high caliber (i.e. magnum) rifle rounds strike a bone relatively close to the surface. In as much, in striking a shin or tibia, most rounds deflected, causing major damage to the surrounding tissue as opposed to a through-and-through wound. Comparably, the composition of bone is more closely related to steel. Lee's further pressing the misinformation that a steel core bullet can pass through an engine block is in as unlikely as a bullet entering the shoulder and exiting the toe. Due to the molecular structure of steel, and the given information of a bullet's "lethality" it is impossible for a 56 to 250 grain (i.e. weight) bullet passing clear through in excess to 1,800 fps. Such a round would not even be able to penetrate a 1/2" thick steel plate, with or without a steel core. That's all I got written last night-- anything you guys think I should add to what's already there?
__________________
![]() Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|